3 ms·
You tried to twist my words. I called the content bullshit and not one of those services say it is. Anything they ban is considered to be violation of their ToS
by excerionsforte 6y ago
You tried to twist my words. I called the content bullshit and not one of those services say it is. Anything they ban is considered to be violation of their ToS. If you have a dispute with the determination, you can file a lawsuit against them and have a judge determine if it was a violation of their ToS.
- wtetzner 6y ago> You tried to twist my words. I did not try to twist your words. If I did, it was entirely unintentional. > I called the content bullshit and not one of those services say it is. You said: > I applaud YouTube, Twitter and FB primarily for trying to not facilitate distribution of bullshit all because free speech. I may have misunderstood what you were trying to say, but it sounded to me like you were happy these services were trying to filter out bullshit. > Anything they ban is considered to be violation of their ToS. If you have a dispute with the determination, you can file a lawsuit against them and have a judge determine if it was a violation of their ToS. I'm not claiming anything about the legality of what they're doing. Only that I disagree with filtering content based on an arbitrary definition of "bullshit". If that is not what you were arguing, then I apologize for my misunderstanding.