3 ms·
I think a relative simple solution to this is written in the first paragraphs. We will more or less 'merge' our minds with computers, just to a further extent t
by jcfrei 16y ago
I think a relative simple solution to this is written in the first paragraphs. We will more or less 'merge' our minds with computers, just to a further extent than we already do now. Nowadays a computer is merely a tool, which helps us keeping in touch with relatives, visualizing ideas, calculating stuff. but this bond will probably become much more intense in the future, where whole subroutines of our thinking will rely on artificial machines. This might only seem like a threat considering our 21st century morality - but I think this will become widely accept in the next century.
- gmaslov 16y agoThe future must be now. At least one of my subroutines of thinking already relies on an artificial machine. I call it my Google neuron; it's wired up directly to everything I don't know off the top of my head and fires whenever I feel unsure about something. Well, the latency is still a bit high, but I'm sure someone is working on that problem. ;)