6 ms·
Right there in the first article: > There was no immediate indication of Russian involvement in the release of emails that the Post obtained, but its general t
by dunkelheit 6y ago
Right there in the first article:
> There was no immediate indication of Russian involvement in the release of emails that the Post obtained, but its general thrust mirrors a narrative that U.S. intelligence agencies have described as part of an active Russian disinformation effort aimed at the 2020 election.
So the only proof that it comes from Russia is basically "that's the kind of thing the Russians would do." Aren't you spreading disinformation yourself by claiming that it is Russian disinformation?
- Rochetshipz 6y agoParticularly, claiming Russian collusion the last time did not turn out to be true, but the Media jumped on this narrative. Let's not do it again.
- save_ferris 6y agoThis has been repeatedly debunked. Crowdstrike, who was hired for the security audit, states very explicitly that their IR team had proof that COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR had breached the network.[0] > To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.” 0: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/ https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democ...
- surge 6y agoOP is talking about collusion and the years of investigations and other nonsense. You're talking about an ineffective hack that's used for scaremongering, that was caught and had little to no effect on the out come of the election.
- esarbe 6y agoThere were extensive contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Even the (bipartisan) Senate report on this states that much. There is nothing nonsense about it.
- skindoe 6y agoWho payed crowd strike to examine the server?
- res0nat0r 6y agoNo, the intelligence agencies already have said this is a Russian disinfo campaign and the Post should be mocked and shunned for knowingly propagating it. https://twitter.com/nicoleperlroth/status/1316585131818115073 https://twitter.com/nicoleperlroth/status/131658513181811507...