3 ms·
IMO, the case of the Nobel prize and salmon ban showed the opposite - that is inexpensive for China to punish a country, but not the opposite. A long analysis
by pizza234 6y ago
IMO, the case of the Nobel prize and salmon ban showed the opposite - that is inexpensive for China to punish a country, but not the opposite.
A long analysis has actually been written on this topic: https://www.cmi.no/publications/5805-too-big-to-fault https://www.cmi.no/publications/5805-too-big-to-fault
While on one hand, a coordinated punishment may be effective, on the other hand, I think China has the power to buy other countries' consent step by step.
Additionally, I think China would never relent; doing so would be an admission of guilt, which is poisonous for their regime.
- burntoutfire 6y ago> Additionally, I think China would never relent; doing so would be an admission of guilt, which is poisonous for their regime. They could spin it in the same manner as Putin - "those degenerate Western bastards are against us, we need to be strong and united to face them etc.".