3 ms·
OK, that's your view on the gender pay gap. I disagree, but set that aside for a moment. We were talking about whether it's appropriate to discuss one's opini
by jlebar 6y ago
OK, that's your view on the gender pay gap. I disagree, but set that aside for a moment.
We were talking about whether it's appropriate to discuss one's opinion on the pay gap -- among other things -- at work, despite its being political. Seems like you're saying it is appropriate? Like, if a woman who reported to you came to you asking for more money to reach parity with a male colleague, I guess you'd say, "I am a hiring manager etc etc and the emperor has no clothes, here's why you make less"? If you think that's OK, then we're in agreement on this point that this is an acceptable topic for work.
As someone who has managed people myself, I think it would be highly relevant to my business function to know where my fellow managers stand on this issue.
- ballenf 6y agoFWIW, if I thought any protected class (or even non-protected) was the basis for a lower-than-deserved pay, I would take that to HR and/or file a whistleblower report. You're talking about illegal activity. Casually surveying people's opinions on breaking the law and potentially leaving an incriminating paper trail that could harm the company seems similar the antitrust topic in the article. I'd say discussions of any illegal activity on the company's behalf should be directed toward HR / legal.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]