> why would they risk having the same thing happen again unless they're actually intending to do it right this time? Why would they continue to claim their sol

> why would they risk having the same thing happen again unless they're actually intending to do it right this time? Why would they continue to claim their solution was E2E encrypted after already admitting it's not? Zoom doesn't care about security. They care about marketing. And customers aren't willing to hold them to task for their BS. I work for a US defense contractor who uses their infernal software - specifically for export restricted communication no less! Apparently it's very easy to get FedRAMP authorization[0]. Zoom has no reason to care about security because their customers clearly don't care. E2E encryption is just another marketing bullet for their website. There wont be another backlash because everyone who cares already abandoned the platform. [0] https://marketplace.fedramp.gov/#!/product/zoom-for-government?sort=productName&productNameSearch=zoom https://marketplace.fedramp.gov/#!/product/zoom-for-governme...