3 ms·
This is a nitpick on "... not a single ..." claim by GP. GP is otherwise right. First figure in the article is a joke. And that makes the article a joke. Plen
by fizixer 6y ago
This is a nitpick on "... not a single ..." claim by GP.
GP is otherwise right. First figure in the article is a joke. And that makes the article a joke.
Plenty of waterfalls out there. Even more non-waterfalls, aware of iterative, modern process, who will kick you out of the discussion if you try to sell them waterfall.
ML processes need innovation over those of traditional s/w dev. This article is the worst place on the internet to look for that innovation.
- sjg007 6y agoPlenty of waterfalls in ML pipelines as well.
- fuzzfactor 6y agoThe circular chart example given for Machine Learning is virtually identical to a cycle of continuous improvement in a service or manufacturing operation, except for one little detail, with Continuous Improvement you don't want the minimum viable product, you want the Maximum Viable Product. Seems like a machine learning outfit would really benefit from a leader who is smarter to begin with, a better learner, and already more skilled in the task that you want the machine to do.