sadly, it looks this still won't get us multi-line lambdas, because macro-expressions can only take other expressions as arguments :( (though the PEP wasn't re

sadly, it looks this still won't get us multi-line lambdas, because macro-expressions can only take other expressions as arguments :( (though the PEP wasn't really clear on this. the grammar rule they give is: macro_expr = MACRO_NAME "(" testlist ")" but i wasn't able to find a definition for `testlist`.) --- EDIT: but taking inspiration from the PEP's reimplementations of python keywords, we could (maybe? kinda?) add macros for expression-oriented versions of statements, and just use those instead! really hope this gets accepted, can't wait to write some truly appalling macros >:D --- EDIT 2: also hey, at least it looks like it can handle do-notation! x = do!( a := foo(), b := bar(), pure(a + b) ) i guess you could even use a <= foo() for binding. i'm sure everyone would love that ;)