3 ms·
The point they made around this was roughly, "Let's say that the US Government is making a case. If they can argue that you used your personal email, personal p
by jakevoytko 6y ago
The point they made around this was roughly, "Let's say that the US Government is making a case. If they can argue that you used your personal email, personal phone number, or ANYTHING for work at any point, they're going to subpoena as much of your private communications as possible and find a way to use the most embarrassing stuff to encourage you to cooperate."
I left this part out of my other post because I was a little fuzzier on the details of what they said, but this was the gist.
Edit: clarity
- brandmeyer 6y agoIn typical Google fashion, there is a semi-automated system for taking snapshots of employees' email history and workstation disk images when discovery demands it. The snapshot feature is even sold as part of ~~G Suite~~ Google Workspace under the Vault product. As `shadowgovt` pointed out: Its a judge and the lawyers who get to decide what does and doesn't get covered by the process.