My point is that the person who submitted this used a deeply misleading title. It really has nothing to do with the NY Post story specifically, or about the ov

My point is that the person who submitted this used a deeply misleading title. It really has nothing to do with the NY Post story specifically, or about the overall "censorship or fact-checking?" story: if the only contribution to the overall story is a dishonest summary of some tweets, a summary that is designed to inflame rather than inform, then it deserves to be flagged on HN. This title only fans a flamewar.