What even is this article? Inlining a bunch of tweets of people questioning the source of the photos/emails/data moreso than the the authenticity of it. Some so

What even is this article? Inlining a bunch of tweets of people questioning the source of the photos/emails/data moreso than the the authenticity of it. Some some sort of appeal to Twitterati authority? Naive me, thinking after seeing countless "according to anonymous sources familiar with so-and-so's thinking" exposes clogging the info-pipes that visible, verifiable evidence would be celebrated. Dubious relevance (and obvious motive) of the evidence aside.