13 ms·
If they say they're using regular AES-GCM from a library that's been decently vetted, the main things you have to worry about are 1. intentional backdoors 2.
by Rebelgecko 6y ago
If they say they're using regular AES-GCM from a library that's been decently vetted, the main things you have to worry about are
1. intentional backdoors
2. someone using the library improperly (like using the same IV for every encryption)
If they're rolling their own encryption library, you have to worry about
1. intentional backdoors
2. someone using the library improperly
3. the quality of their implementation of crypto primitives
Getting #2 right is definitely doable for a typical programmer who takes a little time to understand the basic dos and donts. IMO #3 is not doable for a typical programmer, and certainly isn't trivial even for people that are experts (at least for a relatively complicated pair of algorithms like AES and GCM). So even though #3 is just one more thing that can go wrong, it's way more likely to be a problem than #2
- dylan604 6y ago>1. intentional backdoors With all of the previously disclosed security fiascos of Zoom decisions, this would be my concern. Whether it was for debugging purposes later, it just makes something down the road easier, or it was done to satisfy an external request. I do not trust Zoom to get this right
- searchableguy 6y agoThey acquihired keybase a while ago: https://keybase.io/blog/keybase-joins-zoom https://keybase.io/blog/keybase-joins-zoom
- Corrado 6y agoYes, and that makes me sad every time I think about it. Keybase had such potential to change privacy/encryption but just couldn't make it work financially.