I think you're not wrong, but more cynicism is warranted. As a baseline makes sense that it's going to be easier for people to vote in some places than in othe

I think you're not wrong, but more cynicism is warranted. As a baseline makes sense that it's going to be easier for people to vote in some places than in others. Money spent in the right places could mitigate that imbalance by making voting safe and convenient for everyone. The United States certainly has the resources to make that happen, but it doesn't. This isn't so much active voter suppression as selective passive voter discouragement.