4 ms·

I suspect you and I define the words “fake” and “controversy” quite differently.

• beervirus 6y ago
  The opinion issued by the federal appeals court gives a lot more context than any news article I've seen. Even if you read just the first couple of pages, you'll be better-informed than 99% of the people talking about this, and I suspect you'll see my point. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-50867-CV0.pdf http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-50867-CV0.pdf
  • dvtrn 6y ago
    I’m not sure what bearing a court opinion has on my criticism of your calling the events that happened in Texas “fake”; regardless that said court decided the impact of Abbott’s proclamation was de minimis.
    • beervirus 6y ago
      The court opinion explains what actually happened. My point was that the controversy was fake, not that the events were fake.
      • deleted 6y ago
        [deleted]