3 ms·
You can also mail them in. That whole thing was a fake controversy.
by beervirus 6y ago
You can also mail them in. That whole thing was a fake controversy.
- dvtrn 6y agoI suspect you and I define the words “fake” and “controversy” quite differently.
- beervirus 6y agoThe opinion issued by the federal appeals court gives a lot more context than any news article I've seen. Even if you read just the first couple of pages, you'll be better-informed than 99% of the people talking about this, and I suspect you'll see my point. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-50867-CV0.pdf http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-50867-CV0.pdf
- dvtrn 6y agoI’m not sure what bearing a court opinion has on my criticism of your calling the events that happened in Texas “fake”; regardless that said court decided the impact of Abbott’s proclamation was de minimis.
- beervirus 6y agoThe court opinion explains what actually happened. My point was that the controversy was fake, not that the events were fake.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- failuser 6y agoAre sure the post office is reliable at this point?
- 542354234235 6y agoExcept that one political party has been in the process of attempting to cripple the Post Office and their ability to operate effectively and efficiently for the last 6 months leading up to the election. If I were a paranoid person, I would say it almost looks like some sort of concerted effort. “They need that money in order to make the post office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots. But if they don’t get those two items, that means you can’t have universal mail-in voting.” President Trump