4 ms·
The article is missing the key factor that people will accept some level of crap (in their computer, or it their car) to obtain value, and that minimizing compl
by srtjstjsj 6y ago
The article is missing the key factor that people will accept some level of crap (in their computer, or it their car) to obtain value, and that minimizing complexity strictly for its own sake is almost no one's goal except monks.
- tolstoyevsky 6y agoI understood exactly the opposite point from the article - it's saying the exact thing you're saying, people will accept a CONSTANT AMOUNT of crap to get to their goals, and technology doesn't change this. It only changes how far people can get with that constant amount of crap they're willing to put up with.