5 ms·

> Isn’t sport massively important in US schools? For the kids involved in sports, sure. That's not all kids.

chrisseaton 6y ago
Ah kind of assumed it was mandatory for all children to have a sport or club in the US - films and articles about college admission make it look so.
- davewashere 6y ago
  Athletics is one way high schoolers with less than stellar academic records can navigate past college admissions departments and get accepted at a school where they might not otherwise be qualified. Most people already knew this about scholarship athletes, but the recent college admissions scandal involved non-athletes being listed by college coaches as recruited athletes. It's basically the coach telling the admissions department that this student might play on their team and therefore should get preferential treatment with admissions.
  - slg 6y ago
    This is such a tiny portion of the high school athletics community that is barely worth mentioning. For the vast majority of students participating in sports the only value a sport provides to college admission is as a extracurricular activity. It is no more valuable than being in the school band, acting in the school play, or being a member of the chess club.
    - zests 6y ago
      In my opinion, I'd say being in a "varsity" sport is more valuable than being in an arbitrary club but being in a "club" sport is similar to being in an arbitrary club. Varsity football in a state like Texas or Florida where football is king? Definitely a huge value add even if you are not going to play football in college.
    - thehappypm 6y ago
      Sports can sometimes show a lot of character, in a different way than things like band or school play do. Think about the amount of hard training it takes to become, for example, a state champion distance runner, or wrestler. It takes more internal strength to run 10 miles every day than to practice the flute.
      - brnt 6y ago
        Ah. "Working hard breeds character". I wish my parents hadn't been such blind working class people to understand that that's merely the way to stay working class.
      - pdpi 6y ago
        > It takes more internal strength to run 10 miles every day than to practice the flute. That’s utter nonsense. It takes more physical prowess to run 10 miles, sure, but there’s nothing mentally easy about playing the same damn four bars until you have the passage completely locked in, to put in the effort to go from ok to good to excellent.
        thehappypm 6y ago
        I won’t argue that both take mental prowess. But there’s a difference between overcoming physical hardship and mental tedium.
- kazagistar 6y ago
  In my experience it was a minority of kids. My parents pushed me into it, but I still only spent about half the years in any sport. Of my friend group, only one other person was in formal extracurriculars (jazz band) and the situation was roughly similar across the board, and many clubs are only seasonal.
- kube-system 6y ago
  Sports/clubs aren't typically required for graduation, but kids who are college bound will be highly encouraged to join one or more.
- stronglikedan 6y ago
  Back when I was in (US) high school, the only mandatory physical requirement to graduate was one semester of PE (Physical Education). I took mine over the summer, where it was too hot in my state to go outside, so we played volleyball and ping-pong in the air-conditioned gym all summer. I was not a very physical kid, so that was like winning the lottery for me, since those that took it the rest of the year had to run around the track, and do other outdoor activities in the sun.
- gizmo686 6y ago
  My experience: Before high school, we had a physical education/"gym" class as part of our normal schedule where we would do various althletic things. In high school, we needed a certain amount athletic credits in order to graduate. This worked out to be either 1 season each year on an actual team (competing against other schools); or 2 "seasons" each year of non competative play (e.g. pick-up games of ultimate frisbee, or joining the cross country team for training runs). They would take attendence each day, and you get credit based on how many times you show up (with no requirement that the days you show up are even in the same year; the only time a teacher would complain about you missing a day is if you need the credit to graduate). You could also get credit for sports you do outside of the school.
- oh_sigh 6y ago
  Almost no one goes to college in the US to play a sport. Even a lot of people who go to college to play a sport (D3 athletes) don't get any kind of tangible benefit from it(e.g. salary, tuition reduction, course credits, etc).
  - chrisseaton 6y ago
    > Almost no one goes to college in the US to play a sport. I didn't mean that - I mean people applying for I don't know engineering or whatever having to compete by showing how good their extra-curriculars were.
    - oh_sigh 6y ago
      Ah. That's more common, but also not required. Usually colleges will be looking for extra curriculars, of which sports might be one. But it would be just as well or maybe even better to be part of a debate club, the school newspaper, etc.
- asdff 6y ago
  Consider that a typical suburban U.S. high school might have 10,000+ kids, not everyone will make the soccer team.
  - dragonwriter 6y ago
    > Consider that a typical suburban U.S. high school might have 10,000+ kids Not only is that not typical, there seems to be no US in-person high school in the US that has 10,000+ kids (there are a few online/distance-learning high schools that big or bigger.) It looks like the largest in-person is Brooklyn Technical High School, which has ~6,000.
    - asdff 6y ago
      It was hyperbole, but the point still stands. 3000 kids, not everyone is making the soccer team.
      - dragonwriter 6y ago
        > It was hyperbole, but the point still stands. 3000 kids, not everyone is making the soccer team. The national “top 100” lists of biggest high schools start in the low 3,000s; that's not typical, suburban or otherwise, either.
- sarah180 6y ago
  A better way to think about it is that grades and test scores are probably not enough if you want to get into an elite school. Universities want interesting people who will enrich the campus and their fellow students. One easy way to demonstrate this is through extracurricular activity. If you founded a club, excelled in a sport, engaged in charity, won contests, etc., that's a sign that you're somebody who does things in a community and not just a test taker. (There is room at even top schools for test takers—but you're going to need extremely uncommon scores to stand out that way.)
  - laurent92 6y ago
    I call this, dictatorship of the masses. Masses define « normal » as doing specific things, and normality is enforced for uni, and we don’t select enough for skills. As a person who couldn’t understand social expectations (=Asperger) this is extremely stressful, but now I just read it as the first installment of normal people’s revenge over the work-minded. For what, I don’t know, it’s not like we’ll end up with their loving wife or recognition, but I assure it takes many forms. Meanwhile Asian countries select for skills and don’t hesitate to give 14hrs per day of courses at high school in China depending on provinces. Not that it is enjoyable, but we won’t enjoy much when we have to acknowledge their superiority. A few spots for IQ160 people still excludes a lot of good workers. Perhaps we shouldn’t suppress our hard workers, perhaps we should even acknowledge them, even if they seem boring for normal people. Meanwhile if those could actually help us socially, that would be a big win-win, if only because socially-excluded people are harmful to others, maybe also because most tax dollars comes from hard workers.
    - kridsdale1 6y ago
      I'm not too worried about those Chinese kids who have done nothing but hit the books with their lives.
  - AQuantized 6y ago
    This seems like an good way to get people to contrive as many experiences as possible for this relatively arbitrary metric. To me it seems totally irrelevant, but it seems like American universities are more of a packaged 'experience' than for specialized training specifically.
- fossuser 6y ago
  Most kids don’t get into the colleges that require those things.
- soperj 6y ago
  there wouldn't be a childhood obesity epidemic if that were actually the case.
  - Matticus_Rex 6y ago
    When I was a teacher, most of my obese male students were on the football team. It was not a great football team.
- rhino369 6y ago
  If you are aiming for elite (or semi-elite) schools you need sports or clubs to appear well rounded. 95% of students aren't really trying to get into those colleges. A lot of public colleges essentially create a formula (GPA and SAT/ACT) and the "soft factors" likes clubs and sports only decide when you are in the gray area.

Ah kind of assumed it was mandatory for all children to have a sport or club in the US - films and articles about college admission make it look so.

davewashere 6y ago
Athletics is one way high schoolers with less than stellar academic records can navigate past college admissions departments and get accepted at a school where they might not otherwise be qualified. Most people already knew this about scholarship athletes, but the recent college admissions scandal involved non-athletes being listed by college coaches as recruited athletes. It's basically the coach telling the admissions department that this student might play on their team and therefore should get preferential treatment with admissions.
- slg 6y ago
  This is such a tiny portion of the high school athletics community that is barely worth mentioning. For the vast majority of students participating in sports the only value a sport provides to college admission is as a extracurricular activity. It is no more valuable than being in the school band, acting in the school play, or being a member of the chess club.
  - zests 6y ago
    In my opinion, I'd say being in a "varsity" sport is more valuable than being in an arbitrary club but being in a "club" sport is similar to being in an arbitrary club. Varsity football in a state like Texas or Florida where football is king? Definitely a huge value add even if you are not going to play football in college.
  - thehappypm 6y ago
    Sports can sometimes show a lot of character, in a different way than things like band or school play do. Think about the amount of hard training it takes to become, for example, a state champion distance runner, or wrestler. It takes more internal strength to run 10 miles every day than to practice the flute.
    - brnt 6y ago
      Ah. "Working hard breeds character". I wish my parents hadn't been such blind working class people to understand that that's merely the way to stay working class.
    - pdpi 6y ago
      > It takes more internal strength to run 10 miles every day than to practice the flute. That’s utter nonsense. It takes more physical prowess to run 10 miles, sure, but there’s nothing mentally easy about playing the same damn four bars until you have the passage completely locked in, to put in the effort to go from ok to good to excellent.
      - thehappypm 6y ago
        I won’t argue that both take mental prowess. But there’s a difference between overcoming physical hardship and mental tedium.
kazagistar 6y ago
In my experience it was a minority of kids. My parents pushed me into it, but I still only spent about half the years in any sport. Of my friend group, only one other person was in formal extracurriculars (jazz band) and the situation was roughly similar across the board, and many clubs are only seasonal.
kube-system 6y ago
Sports/clubs aren't typically required for graduation, but kids who are college bound will be highly encouraged to join one or more.
stronglikedan 6y ago
Back when I was in (US) high school, the only mandatory physical requirement to graduate was one semester of PE (Physical Education). I took mine over the summer, where it was too hot in my state to go outside, so we played volleyball and ping-pong in the air-conditioned gym all summer. I was not a very physical kid, so that was like winning the lottery for me, since those that took it the rest of the year had to run around the track, and do other outdoor activities in the sun.
gizmo686 6y ago
My experience: Before high school, we had a physical education/"gym" class as part of our normal schedule where we would do various althletic things. In high school, we needed a certain amount athletic credits in order to graduate. This worked out to be either 1 season each year on an actual team (competing against other schools); or 2 "seasons" each year of non competative play (e.g. pick-up games of ultimate frisbee, or joining the cross country team for training runs). They would take attendence each day, and you get credit based on how many times you show up (with no requirement that the days you show up are even in the same year; the only time a teacher would complain about you missing a day is if you need the credit to graduate). You could also get credit for sports you do outside of the school.
oh_sigh 6y ago
Almost no one goes to college in the US to play a sport. Even a lot of people who go to college to play a sport (D3 athletes) don't get any kind of tangible benefit from it(e.g. salary, tuition reduction, course credits, etc).
- chrisseaton 6y ago
  > Almost no one goes to college in the US to play a sport. I didn't mean that - I mean people applying for I don't know engineering or whatever having to compete by showing how good their extra-curriculars were.
  - oh_sigh 6y ago
    Ah. That's more common, but also not required. Usually colleges will be looking for extra curriculars, of which sports might be one. But it would be just as well or maybe even better to be part of a debate club, the school newspaper, etc.
asdff 6y ago
Consider that a typical suburban U.S. high school might have 10,000+ kids, not everyone will make the soccer team.
- dragonwriter 6y ago
  > Consider that a typical suburban U.S. high school might have 10,000+ kids Not only is that not typical, there seems to be no US in-person high school in the US that has 10,000+ kids (there are a few online/distance-learning high schools that big or bigger.) It looks like the largest in-person is Brooklyn Technical High School, which has ~6,000.
  - asdff 6y ago
    It was hyperbole, but the point still stands. 3000 kids, not everyone is making the soccer team.
    - dragonwriter 6y ago
      > It was hyperbole, but the point still stands. 3000 kids, not everyone is making the soccer team. The national “top 100” lists of biggest high schools start in the low 3,000s; that's not typical, suburban or otherwise, either.
sarah180 6y ago
A better way to think about it is that grades and test scores are probably not enough if you want to get into an elite school. Universities want interesting people who will enrich the campus and their fellow students. One easy way to demonstrate this is through extracurricular activity. If you founded a club, excelled in a sport, engaged in charity, won contests, etc., that's a sign that you're somebody who does things in a community and not just a test taker. (There is room at even top schools for test takers—but you're going to need extremely uncommon scores to stand out that way.)
- laurent92 6y ago
  I call this, dictatorship of the masses. Masses define « normal » as doing specific things, and normality is enforced for uni, and we don’t select enough for skills. As a person who couldn’t understand social expectations (=Asperger) this is extremely stressful, but now I just read it as the first installment of normal people’s revenge over the work-minded. For what, I don’t know, it’s not like we’ll end up with their loving wife or recognition, but I assure it takes many forms. Meanwhile Asian countries select for skills and don’t hesitate to give 14hrs per day of courses at high school in China depending on provinces. Not that it is enjoyable, but we won’t enjoy much when we have to acknowledge their superiority. A few spots for IQ160 people still excludes a lot of good workers. Perhaps we shouldn’t suppress our hard workers, perhaps we should even acknowledge them, even if they seem boring for normal people. Meanwhile if those could actually help us socially, that would be a big win-win, if only because socially-excluded people are harmful to others, maybe also because most tax dollars comes from hard workers.
  - kridsdale1 6y ago
    I'm not too worried about those Chinese kids who have done nothing but hit the books with their lives.
- AQuantized 6y ago
  This seems like an good way to get people to contrive as many experiences as possible for this relatively arbitrary metric. To me it seems totally irrelevant, but it seems like American universities are more of a packaged 'experience' than for specialized training specifically.
fossuser 6y ago
Most kids don’t get into the colleges that require those things.
soperj 6y ago
there wouldn't be a childhood obesity epidemic if that were actually the case.
- Matticus_Rex 6y ago
  When I was a teacher, most of my obese male students were on the football team. It was not a great football team.
rhino369 6y ago
If you are aiming for elite (or semi-elite) schools you need sports or clubs to appear well rounded. 95% of students aren't really trying to get into those colleges. A lot of public colleges essentially create a formula (GPA and SAT/ACT) and the "soft factors" likes clubs and sports only decide when you are in the gray area.