2 ms·
But the author doesn't state why that equilibrium cannot change. He states that is hasn't, which is different. It's the difference between a double blind exper
by Gianteye 15y ago
But the author doesn't state why that equilibrium cannot change. He states that is hasn't, which is different.
It's the difference between a double blind experiment and an epidemiological survey. One attempts to isolate a mechanism that is predictive, another attempts to explain historical trends.
- yummyfajitas 15y agoI don't claim that equilibrium can't change. A speculative bubble is not an equilibrium. It will inflate and pop all on it's own accord. The housing bubble inflated and popped without any underlying changes in fundamental factors (e.g. population). In contrast, a Nash Equilibrium based on signalling will inflate and remain until some fundamental factors change. Women will continue to wear high heels and people will continue getting unnecessary education until these activities stop being a means of obtaining status.