3 ms·
Question as this was before my time. Was Usenet considered public or secure (possibly a foreign idea back then with computing)? Curious if there are any securit
by GNOMES 6y ago
Question as this was before my time. Was Usenet considered public or secure (possibly a foreign idea back then with computing)? Curious if there are any security implications to large archive projects like this, especially considering how early this was, people may have taken confidentiality lightly?
I shudder at a potential early Myspace/Facebook archive in 20-30 years.
- euroclear 6y agoUsenet was public and distributed. Once you posted something, you had no real control over it being retained and archived. There was a message header you could set ("X-No-Archive: yes" IIRC), but it could not really be enforced.
- pmachinery 6y agoX-No-Archive: yes was for Dejanews, and subsequently Google, and worked, at least in terms of what they publicly displayed on their site. For about the past 20 years you don't need an archive though, with some Usenet service providers having posts going back to at least 2003 (with people talking about 2003 being a cut off for this archive, I suspect that's where much of the content is coming from). Major Usenet providers required/had so much space for binaries they just stopped expiring text posts, which are a drop in the ocean by comparison.