2 ms·
‘Literally’ is just going through the same transformation ‘really’ did a couple of centuries ago. Literally. I’m more curious what word will come up to take o
by JackFr 6y ago
‘Literally’ is just going through the same transformation ‘really’ did a couple of centuries ago. Literally.
I’m more curious what word will come up to take on the old role of ‘literally’ when ‘literally’ becomes purely an intensifier.
- srtjstjsj 6y ago"and I am totally not making this up" which unfortunately is also lost. The problem is Godelesque. There's no way to form a consistent language that includes lies.