3 ms·
On the contrary, if we reserve the word "abuse" for situations where the ToS is actually violated then the word becomes more useful. Similarly, if we reserve t
by Reelin 6y ago
On the contrary, if we reserve the word "abuse" for situations where the ToS is actually violated then the word becomes more useful.
Similarly, if we reserve the word "unlimited" for things that are actually, y'know, unlimited, then the word again becomes more useful.
Flagrant disregard for commonly understood definitions of words when it's convenient to one's cause is a concrete example of a tragedy of the commons that makes a language less useful overall.
- dodobirdlord 6y agoThe word abuse also covers scenarios where someone technically or legally has the capability or entitlement to do something, but a convention exists that they will not. This is the usage when someone is said to have “abused their privileges”, or to have engaged in “abuse of process”. It sounds like you object to the standard usage of these words, which doesn’t seem like a productive position. Olive Garden isn’t actually going to give you unlimited breadsticks either.