4 ms·
I don't understand how can you call something "Full self driving" car, and say that it always need a driver, because it can be autonomous most of the time. Tha
by mola 6y ago
I don't understand how can you call something "Full self driving" car, and say that it always need a driver, because it can be autonomous most of the time.
That not most of the time events are exactly what makes it not FSD. And all the promises FSD could bring to the table that don't amount to less driver leg work.
Autonomous cars are a revolution, could actually make cars efficient, and introduce a different ownership model.
Tesla's FSD is just a very capable driver assist, which can't deliver on the promises of real autonomous cars.
- birdyrooster 6y agoElon duped everyone by selling hardware to enable FSD before such a thing was even proved possible. Those people were scammed, fair and square.
- jfim 6y agoThe thing is, the hardware is technically sufficient for full self driving, at least for some definition of "full self driving". Even in the late 90s, there was experimentation with self driving cars that were running a single Pentium with a handful of megabytes of RAM and inexpensive black and white cameras [0]. Now whether the software for that hardware is ready (or will be any time soon) is a different question. [0] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ARGO-and-the-MilleMiglia-in-Automatico-Tour-Broggi-Bertozzi/8193f359528cc94e2bd3d883227f78f27b067325 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ARGO-and-the-MilleMigl...