3 ms·
Clearly you know more about this than me, so a question, I thought the improvements were significant for edge cases of what would be a good photos. So if you us
by Gustomaximus 6y ago
Clearly you know more about this than me, so a question, I thought the improvements were significant for edge cases of what would be a good photos. So if you use old/new in a well lit enviroment either is good, but come dusk the more recent generation are much better in getting a decent photo in a less than ideal enviroment... or have I fallen prey to the marketing!
- mceachen 6y ago> Clearly you know more (Guh, didn't mean to come off as pompous! I was surprised when I realized this a while back and thought it would be interesting to share). Anyway, you're correct: low-light photography is where there's been more recent progress, but it's mostly via computational imagery. Having a depth sensor for portrait shots has helped improve the simulated bokeh, as well. My Google Pixel 1 takes fractionally worse nighttime shots as a current-gen pixel 4. They're both usable, but the pixel 4 is much faster at getting the shot.
- Gustomaximus 6y agoDidnt come off as pompous, just acknowledging I'm uniformed opinion/question in this topic for anyone reading :) Thanks for the insight.