9 ms·
If this is revolutionary, why isn't everybody following his method? My skeptic alarm is going off, but also all of the investigative content I read about it see
by 8f2ab37a-ed6c 6y ago
If this is revolutionary, why isn't everybody following his method? My skeptic alarm is going off, but also all of the investigative content I read about it seems to support the claims. I'm puzzled on why this hasn't seen mass adoption.
- s5300 6y agoNot saying this specifically about Wim Hof, the topic at hand - but: People are lazy. This is quite simply a truth, especially with regards to the USA. If you're not from the USA, we have this absolutely fucking unfathomable obesity epidemic going on. It doesn't get talked about very much. 95%+ of the time, weight regulation is one of the simplest things we know of. Calories in and calories out. Anyways, nobody really gives a fuck about that and will die on the hill of stating it's incorrect. They will then go on to buy the newest ONE PILL DOCTORS DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT TO LOSE YOUR FAT OVERNIGHT for $19.95(x # payments) year after year, new pill doctors don't want you to know about after new pill doctors don't want you to know about, and still be obese, wondering why they specifically can't lose weight - science must just be against them. Ranting about US citizens obesity aside, the tl:dr - Wim Hof most definitely isn't some ridiculously revolutionary thing, but for many it's damn helpful towards their life, but it also takes time and effort to do, which many people aren't disciplined enough to stick to. Also, you have to read. Believe it or not, large amount of people don't like reading lmao.
- Hnrobert42 6y agoThe US obesity epidemic probably has more to do with the sugar content of processed foods than with laziness. As you note, people in general are lazy. Vietnam has the lowest rate of adult obesity yet is the 8th most sedentary population in the world.
- s5300 6y agoI find the sugar argument to be a strawman. Maybe ignorance/functional illiteracy of knowing how to read a nutritional label is a slightly more sound argument. Food deserts are a legitimate issue too. However, simply not caring is quite prevalent.
- 7thaccount 6y agoIt's also legitimately hard to find foods without mass amounts of sugar. Just look at spaghetti sauce. Sugar is everywhere.
- s5300 6y agoI come from a family that was borderline of the definition of "extreme poverty" within the U.S. This is a really poor argument. Aldi spaghetti sauces have ~10g sugars compared to a bottle of coke having ~65g sugars. Look into how many people are using Aldi's spaghetti sauces vs how many people are guzzling coke. Is over sugarized shit literally everywhere in the U.S.? Yes. Can you genuinely not find anything without? No. It is not hard. It's really, really not. As somebody else mentioned, lobbying in the U.S. e.g. the Food Pyramid was an obvious disaster that did nothing good for the situation. However, that can't be a coverall excuse.
- mhh__ 6y agoI think the problem is the amount of processed carbs rather than sugar on its own. Sugar is addictive but not in the concentration you'd get in a pasta sauce (in a can I assume). IIRC most western countries are vastly over-caloried, and have a roughly inverse relationship between BMI and income too.
- junius2020 6y agoProcessed carbohydrates are harmful, however sugar is particularly harmful in its effects on the hormonal system, insulin resistance, concentration, dental decay (and tooth growth in children), psychology of child, irratibility etc. Humans are simply not designed to consume such vast amounts of industrial grade sugar in such quantities. You can literally throw sugar canes into a juicing machine and it has less sugar content than a can of coca cola
- hnra 6y agoHave any good reads (articles/books) on the harmfulness of sugar? It sounds interesting to read about, but Google gives a billion results.
- fiblye 6y ago> Vietnam has the lowest rate of adult obesity yet is the 8th most sedentary population in the world. I'd like to see a citation for this claim and how it was measured. People in Vietnam seemed much more up and active than people in America and they're much slimmer despite drinks there being sweeter than pure syrup in America.
- tim333 6y agoHere's a link to similar https://saigoneer.com/vietnam-news/10653-vietnam-among-the-most-sedentary-countries-on-earth-study https://saigoneer.com/vietnam-news/10653-vietnam-among-the-m... I was a little skeptical myself. "data from the step-counting app Azumio Argus" - they counted steps. I can see how they might walk less as everyone gets around by motor scooter there which often involves less walking that using a car as you can normally park the thing at your destination rather than schlepping around looking for a car park. But I wouldn't really call them sedentary - they are quite a hard working bunch on average.
- brian_cunnie 6y agoAgreed. I'm of the belief that Americans aren't obese because they're lazy or because they're gluttons; instead, I believe it's the food that's killing us. Processed food especially. When I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, I had to switch to a low-cab diet (which cut out a huge swath of processed foods), and I dropped from 170 lbs. to 150 lbs. in a few weeks. And I wasn't trying to lose weight—it just came off.
- spirobel 6y agothats nonsense. The slimmest and fittest I ever was, was when I ate the most processed food in my life. I was cycling from my hometown in bavaria to nice in france. So I just had to eat all this garbage from the supermarket but it got burned immediatly. Funny that he gets downvoted he expressed his point in a very friendly way. I will just say it plainly: fat people are lazy. thats the reason they are fat. You can eat as much sugar and refined food as you want as long as you move around enough.
- lazyjones 6y ago> fat people are lazy. thats the reason they are fat. Probably, but not vice versa (I'm not). So you need to be lazy and eat a lot of garbage to become obese.
- spirobel 6y agohaha lol you are right. its just one of the reasons.
- junius2020 6y agotry not being lazy when your hormone system has been fried with food that is literally illegal to sell in Europe, from early childhood; https://www.thedailymeal.com/travel/american-foods-banned-other-countries https://www.thedailymeal.com/travel/american-foods-banned-ot... or being told that common healthy foods we enjoy in Europe, Australia etc are dangerous and to be avoided; https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/communication/oysters-and-vibriosis.html https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/communication/oysters-and-vib...
- spirobel 6y agoso the government is responsible that you are fat? that sounds like an excuse lol
- ekanes 6y agoAge is also a factor -- when I was younger I could eat two large pizzas at one point without a problem. Now a couple slices and I feel like junk. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- watwut 6y agoGiven that Americans are the nation with longest average working hours among developed world and the nation that is literally worshipping hard work, I find it dubious when people just throw lazy Americans around. I know it is usually Americans doing it to other Americans, but still.
- disposekinetics 6y agoThe debunking podcast "Oh No Ross and Carey" did at least four episodes [1] on Wim Hof. I recommend them if you want a skeptical take. [1] https://ohnopodcast.com/investigations/2020/7/19/ross-and-carrie-cool-off-with-wim-hof-part-1-iceman-edition https://ohnopodcast.com/investigations/2020/7/19/ross-and-ca...
- pm 6y agoWithout having to listen to 4 hours of podcasts, what was their take?
- skosch 6y agoI haven't listened to them but can recommend the Medlife Crisis episode [0], in which he reviews the scientific literature around the effects of cold exposure, blood oxygenation/acidity from hyper-/hypoventilation, and related topics. He comes to the conclusion that Wim Hof is likely a genetic outlier, but that breathing techniques can have real physiological effects on things like pain perception, and that cold exposure likely has a bunch of real benefits – but also that placebo may play a big role (which is nevertheless a very real effect). [0] https://youtu.be/D6EPuUdIC1E?t=2215 https://youtu.be/D6EPuUdIC1E?t=2215 (timestamped to the conclusions)
- swader999 6y agoHe's taken people up mountains in -15 C wearing just shorts after a few days of training. So I'm not sure it's just him being unique.
- lvturner 6y agoI tried it, while I won't make any claims of massively improved health, it did one very notable thing for me. I've perviously never been able to meditate (or self-hypnotise) my brain would always conspire against me and race with millions of thoughts. When I tried the Wim Hoff breathing methods, everything was suddenly quiet. This in turn has made a lot of other small things in my life easier. The claims may be overblown and some of the science dubious - but being able to reclaim some additional control over my brain has, to me, been worth the "risk" of trying breathing in a funny manner once a day. A friend of mine tried it after being curious about my experiences for months, and immediately sent me a text message saying thanks. I think perhaps it hasn't seen mass adoption because most people face some kind of psychological barrier in trying it either from fear, or seeing it as quackery and a waste of time. Coupled with mainstream medicine being reluctant to recommend something with relatively little supporting evidence (I guess). While Wim himself has succeeded in making money from it, it is also something that is difficult to patent and sell - unlike a pill (no big-phrama conspiracies here - just money is always a motivator)
- wavefunction 6y agoFrom what I understand his methods are revolutionary for people with his same physiology. He and his brother were the subject of a study which seems to cast doubt on the potential of his claims for people without a similar physiology: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101653 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
- watwut 6y agoHow does experiment on his and his brother can possibly cast doubt on potential for different people? I mean, the study did not measured anything on different people.
- wavefunction 6y agoThe study showed that he and his brother, who has a similar brown fat physical makeup but doesn't follow the 'Wim Hoff method' performed pretty much the same.
- calibas 6y agoI'm not sure mass adoption is a good way of judging anything.
- mhh__ 6y agoMedicine and computers are pretty good by the looks of things
- humanlion87 6y agoI think there are a lot of examples of mass adoption of "bad" things also. Fast food and processed sugar are the ones that come to mind immediately.
- dilap 6y agoI'm skeptical of health claims, but I have definitely personally found doing 3 rounds of Wim Hof + a cold shower in the morning leaves me feeling pretty great. I would say it requires a level of discipline and interest in "doing work" that most people don't have, so even if it is as revolutionary as claimed, I wouldn't be at all surprised that not everybody is following the method.
- jrm4 6y ago"Because it doesn't make anyone money" is my best guess. I kinda hate how conspiracy-theory-ish it sounds, but I can't much deny it any more? I'm one anecdotal data point: Never heard of this guy, but the cold shower thing just sounded plausible enough that I figured I'd try it. Not even the whole thing cold -- I start off with a hot shower and then just drop it for the last minute or so, as long as I can stand. And -- it's CRAZY. After getting the regular yearly colds that I just presumed were a part of life...they just stopped. I haven't had any sort of cough/cold sickness at ALL going on about 3 years.
- nvader 6y agoIt's also hard. I used to do the same morning cold plunge as you. I have stopped, sometime in the last couple of months, because like any good habit, it needs to be maintained. I am going to commit to doing this again tomorrow, though, because I remember that it makes me feel good.
- nvader 6y agoDid it this morning, and can report that I feel great :)
- newsbinator 6y ago> After getting the regular yearly colds that I just presumed were a part of life...they just stopped. The same thing happened to me after age 34 for some reason. It's been years so far. I haven't done any breathing exercises though.
- honzzz 6y agoTo provide one anecdotal data counterpoint: I decided to try cold showers a few years ago (not Wim Hof method, just showers) and although I generaly get ill very rarely, that year I cougt something three times. It obviously does not prove anything, might have been just bad luck, but after the third time I did not have the willpower to restart the cold showers routine again. Maybe I was doing it wrong but I do not know how - I started with just showering my legs with lukewarm water and progressed to colder water and longer time gradually, very slowly. However, it never made me feel as good as some people here descibe. Sometimes I felt slightly refreshed during the summer but more often I just felt cold and stiff and I had strong desire to return to bed to warm up but I could not do that and I had to sit in my office cold and miserable for hours. Maybe cold showers are not for everybody?
- mrslave 6y ago> why isn't everybody following his method Eat less processed foods. Go for a walk. Stand up and stretch occasionally. Take the stairs. Lift some weights. All will improve your life and are trivially achieved by almost everyone. Yet too many people - perhaps most - choose not to do any of these.
- swader999 6y agoA lot of people are!
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- borroka 6y agoIt may or may not be fraudulent, but please keep in mind that certain US states have ~ 40% obesity rates. It sounds obvious to the non-obese that eating like there is no tomorrow is not conducive to a good life; and simple measures, like eating less and moving more, can dramatically improve quality of life. But to the obese, it might not be so obvious for a variety of reasons (and yes, there are also genetic and environmental and mental health problems contributing to obesity, but also not caring much about one's own life).