4 ms·

For evidence, read the Senate Intelligence Report: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf https://www.intelligenc

For evidence, read the Senate Intelligence Report: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/docu... In the case of Norway, this could be a public signal to Russia indicating the motivation for some other action, such as the recent Su-30 friendly fire incident, the recent munitions dump explosion, dramatically enhanced IT capabilities by the Belarus opposition movement etc. So a message: "If you do this, we do that." If the acting parties know who they are, no public proof is necessary to send the message.

cnst 6y ago
966 pages of random circumstantial evidence, none of it connected to the state, none of it proving actual interference, none of it establishing a motive, none of it establishing an intent? Surely, if you say something often enough, or drown the reader with irrelevant details, people will just believe it. The recently declassified documents in the last month or so, point to a very different picture on 2016, however. Meanwhile, actual election interference in 2020 by foreign nationals like Greta of Sweden -- even right after her candidate has publicly denounced Green New Deal in the first debate, and after he's openly supported Fracking in Pennsylvania -- is totally okay with everyone!