3 ms·

That's really not a good faith argument. It's a dire situation with no good solution. Ascribing grand malice diminishes that. It's reductionist.

• easytiger 6y ago
  Perhaps revisit the start of this discussion. Lockdown will not frustrate the virus regarding any long term objective.
  • nkozyra 6y ago
    > Perhaps revisit the start of this discussion. For what? People who side on curtailing a public health crisis do not want the economy to collapse. To claim a lockdown is ineffective is to deny the transmissivity of airborne viruses.
    • easytiger 6y ago
      > To claim a lockdown is ineffective is to deny the transmissivity of airborne viruses. Good thing I didn't claim that then