3 ms·
No I think it's the opposite, or at least, every situation is different. Consider a one-on-one chat (either over an instant messenger, or face to face in person
by Thorentis 6y ago
No I think it's the opposite, or at least, every situation is different. Consider a one-on-one chat (either over an instant messenger, or face to face in person). The period of time after which it becomes an "awkward silence" is much shorter in person.
If I ask somebody a question in person and they take 5 mins to respond then that's a pretty ling awkward silence. If I message somebody on Slack and they take 5 mins to respond then that's not unreasonable.
You could argue that the "Seen" feature of chat is meant to lower the acceptable wait time online, and indeed it does, but still not by as much. If somebody has "Seen" my message but doesn't reply after a couple mins, I'll start to wonder why, but usually my reasonableness kicks in and I think maybe they just are busy or didn't mean to click the notification or something. I'd still wait far longer for somebody to respond to a "seen" message than I would for somebody to respond to a "heard" question I asked them in person.
- mycall 6y agoWith multitasking and sharing your time chopped up being online, you can't always respond to chats or attention grabbing notifications as they would expect in person (visual cues aside). We are more forgiven online and awkward silence here.
- BrandoElFollito 6y agoIn a direct, face to face conversation, you are fully dedicated to the other person. This means the time between interactions has a meaning on its own (thinking about whet the other party said, not agreeing ,...) In a chat you are expected/allowed to do other things in the meantime.