2 ms·
> But there is no strong evidence so far that it’s a cause of good health. The linked paper seems to contradict this pretty strongly. E.g.: > "vitamin D is a
by antonvs 6y ago
> But there is no strong evidence so far that it’s a cause of good health.
The linked paper seems to contradict this pretty strongly.
E.g.:
> "vitamin D is a powerful nuclear receptor-activating hormone of critical importance, especially to the immune system."
That's just one example - the article mentions several others.
> I just read specialists claiming this
There are a lot of quacks in this field - are you sure you're not reading some of those?
- avsteele 6y ago> "vitamin D is a powerful nuclear receptor-activating hormone of critical importance, especially to the immune system." This just means there is a plausible mechanism of action. It in no way implies positive health effects for particular levels (except possibly in limiting cases)