Just to correct your blog post, the Webmentions spec says in this scenario where you're just logging, you "MUST" return a 202 Accepted. I went through a similar

Just to correct your blog post, the Webmentions spec says in this scenario where you're just logging, you "MUST" return a 202 Accepted. I went through a similar phase (logsink with 204) which I corrected recently. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-webmention-20170112/#h-receiving-webmentions https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-webmention-20170112/#h-receiv... I was wondering if I should've sent this comment as a webmention instead but I guess old habits die hard.