3 ms·
If remote was the best (most profitable) way to do things, companies would've figured this out well before COVID.
by tootahe45 6y ago
If remote was the best (most profitable) way to do things, companies would've figured this out well before COVID.
- colinmhayes 6y agoNot saying wfh is as productive as in office, but the tech stack needed to make wfh work became available only very recently. Skype didn't cut it.
- Pokepokalypse 6y agoI would flag github as a more crucial requirement. We've had various im/irq platforms for decades. They weren't really a substitute for video - but video is only a tiny fraction of team communications, and simple chat satisfies most of those requirements.
- kelnos 6y agoYou're thinking too small. A tiny fraction of the people in the US use GitHub. Even a relatively small fraction (certainly under 50%) can use Zoom to do their jobs. Remote collaboration tools like GH have been crucial for remote work for software developers, but that's a really small slice of the pie.
- ghaff 6y agoEven at companies that employ software developers, many don't use GitHub specifically or don't use much. And most of the sales, marketing, finance people at those companies don't use GitHub much either. Many of the developers I know were collaborating on open source projects around the world before GitHub came along so it's hardly a prereq.
- irrational 6y agoInstead of github you should say code repositories. We used subversion back in the earlier 2000s to do remote work with contractors. It worked just as good as GitHub for remote collaboration.
- bart_spoon 6y agoThis assumes that companies are always operating in a maximally efficient way. Anyone who has worked in a corporate setting, particularly for a large corporation, knows this is never the case. Far too often, things are done one way because that's the way its always been done.