3 ms·
No they are not free. But there are other ways to approach monetization. There is a style to some videos that some of just just find annoying and a real turnof
by pugworthy 6y ago
No they are not free. But there are other ways to approach monetization. There is a style to some videos that some of just just find annoying and a real turnoff. Literally.
- WrtCdEvrydy 6y ago> There is a style to some videos that some of just just find annoying and a real turnoff. Literally. Maybe because we reward this style with views, engagement and ultimately money.
- djfkgljd 6y ago>...a real turnoff. Literally. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- ipython 6y agoWhat are the other, more “high brow” ways, to approach monetization?
- brg 6y agoBy way of example, NileRed and AppliedScience take extremely different approaches to both presentation and acknowledging sponsorship.
- pugworthy 6y agoGo watch some of the videos from “Primitive Technology” or “My Mechanics” or "Silently Cooking". No talking, no music, goofy thumbnail pics with emoji faces or red circles. Just creating. The content may not be your cup of tea but personally I as well as others seem to enjoy them.
- pugworthy 6y agoNot the same style but Marques Brownlee is hugely successful while creating useful, entertaining, and valuable content.
- ballenf 6y agoHere are 5 YT channels covering technology, engineering and tools that feel much less monetization-focused, but still produce very informative content: - Tech Ingredients - DIY Perks - Brainiac75 - Project Farm (not really about farming -- cut & dry tools & such review) - AvE (Arduino vs. evil) (not really about arduino) (sibling comment included a couple others that I would have included here also) The first two focus on engineering and building unique things, so are probably the most similar to the creators in question. AvE is all over the map and an either love or hate kind of channel -- and the channel seems more about educating, teaching and evaluating others' engineering.