>The problem is that you can’t realistically fight Holocaust denial and the idea behind it with arguments at some point. It sounds like you're a holocaust deni

>The problem is that you can’t realistically fight Holocaust denial and the idea behind it with arguments at some point. It sounds like you're a holocaust denier. If they're wrong, then show they're wrong. (not saying they're right). If they refuse to believe, then ignore them. They are a fringe. >these people won’t stop sowing doubt that it occurred Diversity of thought is strictly a good thing. The very thing you are worried about is a lack of diversity of thought. A world where questioning the superiority of certain groups of people is tantamount to a crime. Let them sow doubt, it keeps the marketplace of ideas healthy by giving people reasons to articulate the truth. >Every freedom has its limits This is sloppy. Either you embrace free expression as an ideal, or you don't. Anything short of free speech absolutism will decay back down to suppression and censorship. I don't think it's hard to separate out expression from incitement, and I believe the former should be unbounded.