> If you're against all forms of intellectual property you could just say that and clear things up. Yes, I am. But the validity of intellectual property isn't

> If you're against all forms of intellectual property you could just say that and clear things up. Yes, I am. But the validity of intellectual property isn't relevant to my argument in general I think. It just so happens to be true in my case. I'm not sure laws should change to match our ethics to be honest. But I think that's part of the "deeper disagreement" I alluded to in my parent comment.