4 ms·

I'm not sure of your number or the actual impact, but yes, it's going to cost something whether you do it or not.

• easytiger 6y ago
  I guess some people just want to see the world eviscerated by this, and some don't.
  • nkozyra 6y ago
    That's a false dichotomy. This is obviously a balance, and someone will be upset (or sick or worse) no matter what choices are made. I'll say this - all of the resulting pains are temporary except one. Maybe we should continue to be thoughtful of that as we battle what is a temporary struggle.
    • easytiger 6y ago
      It's not a false dichotomy.some people are indeed happy to see our way of life destroyed.
      • nkozyra 6y ago
        That's really not a good faith argument. It's a dire situation with no good solution. Ascribing grand malice diminishes that. It's reductionist.
        • easytiger 6y ago
          Perhaps revisit the start of this discussion. Lockdown will not frustrate the virus regarding any long term objective.
          • nkozyra 6y ago
            > Perhaps revisit the start of this discussion. For what? People who side on curtailing a public health crisis do not want the economy to collapse. To claim a lockdown is ineffective is to deny the transmissivity of airborne viruses.
            • easytiger 6y ago
              > To claim a lockdown is ineffective is to deny the transmissivity of airborne viruses. Good thing I didn't claim that then