> I've had to remove AGPL from consideration. This is because I want companies to be able to use the software for their internal use but not be able to create a

> I've had to remove AGPL from consideration. This is because I want companies to be able to use the software for their internal use but not be able to create a user-facing product out of it. That's the whole point of the AGPL, isn't it? This license solves exactly the problem that you want to solve. They can use your AGPL software internally as much as they want, without restrictions. But if they create a user-facing product out of it, they must make their modifications available to everybody under the same terms. (EDIT: changed you/they on the second paragraph)