2 ms·
Yeah, that would work as an excuse back in ANSI days. we have UTF8 as a standard nowadays.
by Xelbair 6y ago
Yeah, that would work as an excuse back in ANSI days.
we have UTF8 as a standard nowadays.
- jdmichal 6y agoUnicode doesn't magically make this stuff go away, much less any specific encoding of it. A glyph can consist of multiple codepoints, and then those can sometimes be standardized to other codepoints. For instance, Unicode has codepoint U+00C4 for an A with a diaeresis (aka umlaut). But it also has codepoints U+0041 U+0308 for an A with a combining diaeresis, which should then map to the combined U+00C4 for font rendering.
- Xelbair 6y agoand both cases should be handled properly, as it is in Unicode standard.