3 ms·
Random wackos views are driven by self preservation same as Washington Post's. Atleast the wacko is not doing it for ad revenue.
by rtx 6y ago
Random wackos views are driven by self preservation same as Washington Post's.
Atleast the wacko is not doing it for ad revenue.
- kthejoker2 6y agoNo. Don't even. Which of them is credentialed by the Trump administration? Credibility counts. The Washington Post is filled with award winning journalism, awards given out by organizations with members from all political stripes and persuasions, awards given for thorough investigations, painstaking research, thoughtful analysis, nuance, insight, and good judgment. The same can be said for The Economsist, the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, and hundreds of other organizations worldwide. Comparing institutional media that thrives on establishing credibility and legitimacy to "random wackos" is the height of false equivalency.
- rtx 6y agoSame wackos got us WikiLeaks when these very papers were promoting WMD. Result a million brown people dead.
- kace91 6y agoWikileaks is an institution as well, with a reputation attached to it, and (presumably) a bar one must clear for information to be declared worth publishing under their name.