4 ms·
This would be a 'local hidden variable' theory. According to wikipedia these have largely been ruled out: Most advocates of the hidden-variables idea believe t
by Simon321 6y ago
This would be a 'local hidden variable' theory. According to wikipedia these have largely been ruled out:
Most advocates of the hidden-variables idea believe that experiments have ruled out local hidden variables
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem#Bell_inequalities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem#Bell_inequali...
- goldenkey 6y agoIt seems that hidden variables have always been made to be simple hidden states. But we now know about RNGs and seeds and such. A shared RNG seed is essentially entanglement. This delves more into complex hidden variables, that normal analyses ignore: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137470/
- kgwgk 6y ago> A shared RNG seed is essentially entanglement. Classical entanglement, which is not good enough to explain quantum entanglement.
- aeternum 6y agoIt can explain quantum entanglement, seems to be a version of superdeterminism. In QM, experiments show us that entangled particle spin probabilities vary non-linearly with the angle between detectors (even if those detectors are far apart). This means that either: 1) locality is broken.. state is somehow transmitted faster than the speed of light between particles. 2) realism is broken.. god plays dice with the universe But there's also a 3rd, which is: the choice of detector angle is not an independent variable (a necessary assumption for Bell's inequalities to hold).. instead the state of the universe is pre-determined and the experimenter's choice of detector angle is known beforehand so there is no need for spooky action at a distance. This isn't a very popular explanation since it provides no reason as to why we don't see this weird lack of independence elsewhere.
- kgwgk 6y agoWell, if superdeterminism is an explanation there is nothing to explain ;-)