If it quacks like a duck it might as well not be. If plants are significantly altered so as to be patent able, I would prefer if their name and shape and color

If it quacks like a duck it might as well not be. If plants are significantly altered so as to be patent able, I would prefer if their name and shape and color is altered also. There is a a consensus of what each plant should be like each Millennium including its sugar content and other nutritional properties. Additionally for the consumer, any producer side advantages are inconsequential and should not be cognitively burdened by them. As long as any actual innovative patents are not infringed by another corporate entity people are entitled to use, repair, brake anything they pay for as they see fit. Why must profit maximisation scheme forbid the natural right to plant your plant?