4 ms·
As someone who moved from CVS, to SVN, to tla/GNU Arch, to git (shortly after initial release). I haven't found any reason to move on from git ever since. Each
by megous 6y ago
As someone who moved from CVS, to SVN, to tla/GNU Arch, to git (shortly after initial release). I haven't found any reason to move on from git ever since. Each step was a major change in features and ease of use. It's hard to see it as a failed system, with "bad" user experience.
And the whole premise is nonsense. I certainly haven't spent more time on learning git than doing the work in the last 15 years or so of using it.
- wildleaf 6y agoI agree, my current company is stuck on cvs. I've been using git for years until now and it feels like I've had my legs chopped off.
- anotherevan 6y agoAs someone who moved from CVS, to SVN, to Mercurial (with side-trips to SCCS, VSS, Bzr and Git along the way), I haven't found any reason to move from Mercurial ever since.
- megous 6y agoThe thing is that if you commit to some well supported DVCS, UI differences between them are not that earth shattering, compared to VCS that need a server.
- anotherevan 6y agoWell, I disagree. I find Mercurial much easier to grok and use than Git, and I learned Git first.
- megous 6y agoThe basic UI looks pretty much the same as the git one I'm used to.
- anotherevan 6y agoStrange as it may seem, I still disagree with you.