Funny but disingenuous, since "predicts" implies that the model was created before the 1960 election. This no more predicts a 15-bit value than getting two spec

Funny but disingenuous, since "predicts" implies that the model was created before the 1960 election. This no more predicts a 15-bit value than getting two specific bytes out of a PRNG with a specific seed. It's just like that post a few years ago where newspapers used various dodgy "predictors" like "a [state name] president has never lost a reelection", and someone had collected a bunch of these which turned out wrong.