3 ms·
If the goal is prevent the maximum damage to the economy possible, then lock-downs should probably be extremely brief I respectfully disagree. For a while I'v
by MilnerRoute 6y ago
If the goal is prevent the maximum damage to the economy possible, then lock-downs should probably be extremely brief
I respectfully disagree. For a while I've been thinking that's more or less a classic false choice -- this argument that those in the "saving lives" camp are somehow refusing to care about the powerful value in our economy.
But I think you save the economy by beating the virus. People won't walk into a crowded and poorly ventilated restaurant until the virus is gone. Anything that prolongs the virus's presence in our country will drag down the economy. I feel like some of the "pro-economy" people aren't sufficiently recognizing that.
- JJzD 6y agoSweden tried to save the economy, but ended up with a similar hit to the economy as other European countries, at a higher cost of lives. Hopefully their second wave has less impact, with more people immune now, but it proves your point. We need to have a basic trust before we spent any money (excluding basic needs of course)