4 ms·
Haha, I always wondered if I'd find a thread on HN that actually recognized that workers are human and to be human is to defecate. Truly the one thing we have i
by core-questions 6y ago
Haha, I always wondered if I'd find a thread on HN that actually recognized that workers are human and to be human is to defecate. Truly the one thing we have in common with kings. The true art is to speak about it obliquely.... probably won't accomplish that here.
In All Quiet on the Western Front, there's a passage about this, where the men discover a tremendous camaraderie about their shared shitting time - since there's no way to have privacy or any nicer facilities than what they can scrape together, it's basically just a purely functional experience. They sit in a field and provide each other dignity, instead of privacy; something we could well learn from.
Interestingly, the Romans also had this - https://www.history.com/.image/t_share/MTcxODU0MDM4OTM2MDY5NDQy/roman-latrine-gettyimages-639163710.jpg https://www.history.com/.image/t_share/MTcxODU0MDM4OTM2MDY5N... - and it seems they did fine by it. It may be only really in relatively recent Western culture that we added a layer of shame over a natural act, and in turn required immense privacy for it. Wasn't the Tuilieries garden in Paris a place where fancy ladies might pop a squat?
I once worked at a startup with 300 people on a floor with one bathroom with 3 stalls. 90% men. You'd always be waiting, you'd always be voiding yourself next two two other people. Maybe people you'd be going back to sit next to in a few minutes. You begin to know things about people you don't want to know.
I myself of course do prefer the privacy, like most anyone, and further prefer a single occupancy bathroom because the hygiene opportunities are much better when you have direct and private access to a sink. I think the 300 people to 3 stalls situation was probably close to violating some kind of building code and at the very least it's just not a good example of treating your workers as though you value them.
On the far polar opposite, I worked at a startup that had 5 single-occupancy bathrooms for 50 people. Two of them had showers. It was so much nicer in every way.... just that feeling that you were as comfortable at work as you are at home. Not just cattle, but treated with modern dignity; there's a cost to the employer to do this, but it might actually have ROI in the sense that your employees are more comfortable and healthier.
- qqqwerty 6y agoI would gladly take a roman bathroom over what I had at the office. I have no shame about the act, merely hate having to hold it in during a long meeting because there was a line for the bathrooms before hand. Oddly enough, I think the shift to open offices deserves at least some credit here. I think most office spaces were designed with a median estimate of occupancy in mind. Before open offices, it was a mix of offices and cubicles, with much less density. When I worked in a cube farm, we had 4 stalls and 2 urinals for about 60-70 men on two floors. My most recent office had 2 single occupancy bathrooms for about 40 people. If we count the urinal as 0.5 toilet, we get almost double the per-bathroom density in the open office. And the other confounding factor is when you combine open offices with cell phones, the bathroom turns into the 'Candy Crush break'. I imagine median occupancy times were lower back in the day, as lugging a newspaper or magazine to the bathroom was a little too obvious.
- brmgb 6y agoJust so you know and for what it's worth I am actually extremely shocked by what I am reading here. All of these would be completely illegal in my country and I don't understand why Americans agree to work in such conditions. Here you need at least a stall and an urinal per twenty male occupants and two stalls per twenty female and the entrance can't be directly connected to the working space so you need to have an intermediate space (a corridor or a changing room for example).
- core-questions 6y ago> All of these would be completely illegal in my country and I don't understand why Americans agree to work in such conditions. I'm not American, friend. Poor conditions exist even in very nice places, simply because people don't get together and do anything about it. After all, who wants to be the Bathroom Advocacy Dude?