> We should stop talking about "lockdowns", and possibly never should have thought that way. The question is over restrictions, WHAT restrictions should we have

> We should stop talking about "lockdowns", and possibly never should have thought that way. The question is over restrictions, WHAT restrictions should we have, what alterations to usual way of doing things. Agreed, but there needs to be a discussion about what an acceptable amount of cases is as well. Because the strategy seems to be eradication, which is ridiculous. As soon as any restrictions are eased there is much hand wringing the second case counts go above some very low but arbitrary level.