Yes. And most everything else that isn't evidence of intent to commit a crime (which should probably still be allowed so police can investigate). It singles o

Yes. And most everything else that isn't evidence of intent to commit a crime (which should probably still be allowed so police can investigate). It singles out an individual to the group as being full or hate and bile, censoring would not disappear the person, it would only force them to be more convincing and manipulative. It would trigger a backlash in which would be a convincing and Thorough retort of the viewpoint, giving good immunity to lurkers in their lives after that should they come across this viewpoint again. It would ensure that a constant evaluation of what is true within society. Without this we really don't know what is true. open discourse has its problems, but its literally our only vehicle from bad ideas to good ideas.