3 ms·
Ergonomic and usability considerations are rarely valued because they do not have a cell on a spreadsheet. What is measured tends to improve. What does not te
by gjvc 6y ago
Ergonomic and usability considerations are rarely valued because they do not have a cell on a spreadsheet. What is measured tends to improve. What does not tends to worsen.
Programmers have been driven to obsess about features to the exclusion of other criteria (security being a category with many examples) will not have had the freedom to experiment and come up with easier, more consideration workflows and interactions. This also means that they are not practiced at it. It follows that so-called (in the article) unicorn programmers are rare, perhaps because the environments in which they can get better are rare.
"Don't hate the player, hate the game."
- diob 6y agoThis is interesting because I think the problem is about what is measured, not what isn't. Have you happened to read the Tyranny of Metrics? It talks about how we measure what is easy to measure, then use that. And once others know what we're measuring, they game the system. So the moment something becomes a metric, it ceases to be a good metric.