I think people arguing against the fallacy clearly didn't read it or aren't arguing in good faith. There is an important line, where it only applies to ideas o

I think people arguing against the fallacy clearly didn't read it or aren't arguing in good faith. There is an important line, where it only applies to ideas or arguments that can't be addressed logically. If you have an intolerant idea that can't be addressed logically then it should be censored. If you ignore facts, you can't be argued with based on logic. Your intolerant opinion should be censored. This idea isn't that sinister.