3 ms·
This is interesting in of itself, but it’s too bad the researchers chose to post the content native to Facebook. At this point it feels like science and the pr
by bredren 6y ago
This is interesting in of itself, but it’s too bad the researchers chose to post the content native to Facebook.
At this point it feels like science and the products of scientific work should be very wary of Facebook for hosting, despite the simplicity and breadth of distribution.
- NoOneCaresAtAll 6y agoHow is this top comment? Where is Dang?
- dang 6y agoI've marked it off-topic now. Just a reminder, so as not to pick on anybody personally, that the issue with these is not the comment itself but the upvotes that pin it to the top of a thread. It's a tragedy of the commons in that no one upvote does that, but the sum of the upvotes does. Then we end up with a generic argument about Facebook instead of a discussion about orcas.
- bredren 6y agoThanks for the comment and your work, dang.
- dylan604 6y agoI would have assumed YouTube. Facebook may or may not show it's very large audience your posts in other people's feeds. Also, YT is searchable on site and via web search.