> I'm more referring to what the shareholders will do if the company is clearly not acting in the interests of actually making them money That's fine, but "fid

> I'm more referring to what the shareholders will do if the company is clearly not acting in the interests of actually making them money That's fine, but "fiduciary duty" is a specific legal concept and you are misusing it. Making shareholders angry enough to vote you off the board is not the same thing. Also, it's worth noting that institutional investors often rubber-stamp the board's recommendations in shareholder votes. One side effect of the rise of passive funds is that there is less shareholder opposition to board moves nowadays.