I can understand you. This is the reason, I miss lisp. Why language designers ignore syntax ? Syntax should be CONSISTENT, INTUTIVE and LESS AMBIGUOS (there sho

I can understand you. This is the reason, I miss lisp. Why language designers ignore syntax ? Syntax should be CONSISTENT, INTUTIVE and LESS AMBIGUOS (there should be one good way to do thing). As a enduser, I want to focus on solving problem at hand, instead tackling/remembering language syntax/quirks(and new apis). Let me give a very simple example in golang. Function returning single value and function returing multiple values. func foo(x int, y int) int {} func bar(x int, y int) (int, int) {} Even though below synatx works, func bar(x int, y int)(int) {} why there is a additional way to do it by removing parenthesis ? This looks very simple example. But it breaks consistancy of syntax. Adds 2 rules to remember over what saving 2 keystrokes ? In the age of 100x full stack devs, life really sucks.